Life Expectancy After Treatment of Metastatic Bone Disease: An International Trend Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The decision to treat metastatic bone disease (MBD) surgically depends in part on patient life expectancy. We are unaware of an international analysis of how life expectancy among these patients has changed over time. Therefore, we asked (1) how has the life expectancy for patients treated for MBD changed over time, and (2) which, if any, of the common primary cancer types are associated with longer survival after treatment of MBD? METHODS: We reviewed data collected from 2000 to 2022 in an international MBD database, as well as data used for survival model validation. We included 3,353 adults who underwent surgery and/or radiation. No patients were excluded. Patients were grouped by treatment date into period 1 (2000 to 2009), period 2 (2010 to 2019), and period 3 (2020 to 2022). Cumulative survival was portrayed using Kaplan-Meier curves; log-rank tests were used to determine significance at P < 0.05. Subgroup analyses by primary cancer diagnosis were performed. RESULTS: Median survival in period 2 was longer than in period 1 ( P < 0.001). Median survival (at which point 50% of patients survived) had not been reached for period 3. Median survival was longer in period 2 for all cancer types ( P < 0.001) except thyroid. Only lung cancer reached median survival in period 3, which was longer compared with periods 1 and 2 ( P < 0.001). Slow-growth, moderate-growth, and rapid-growth tumors all demonstrated longer median survival from period 1 to period 2; only rapid-growth tumors reached median survival for period 3, which was longer compared with periods 1 and 2 ( P < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Median duration of survival after treatment of MBD has increased, which was a consistent finding in nearly all cancer types. Longer survival is likely attributable to improvements in both medical and surgical treatments. As life expectancy for patients with MBD increases, surgical methods should be selected with this in mind. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: VI.

The role of imaging in extremity sarcoma surgery.

The surgical management of extremity bone and soft tissue sarcomas has evolved significantly over the last 50 years. The introduction and refinement of high-resolution cross-sectional imaging has allowed accurate assessment of anatomy and tumor extent, and in the current era more than 90% of patients can successfully undergo limb-salvage surgery. Advances in imaging have also revolutionized the clinician's ability to assess treatment response, detect metastatic disease, and perform intraoperative surgical navigation. This review summarizes the broad and essential role radiology plays in caring for sarcoma patients from diagnosis to post-treatment surveillance. Present evidence-based imaging paradigms are highlighted along with key future directions.

Symptomatic Neuroma Development following En Bloc Resection of Skeletal and Soft-Tissue Tumors: A Retrospective Analysis of 331 Cases.

BACKGROUND: Although symptomatic neuroma formation has been described in other patient populations, these data have not been studied in patients undergoing resection of musculoskeletal tumors. This study aimed to characterize the incidence and risk factors of symptomatic neuroma formation following en bloc resection in this population. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed adults undergoing en bloc resections for musculoskeletal tumors at a high-volume sarcoma center from 2014 to 2019. The authors included en bloc resections for an oncologic indication and excluded non-en bloc resections, primary amputations, and patients with insufficient follow-up. Data are provided as descriptive statistics, and multivariable regression modeling was performed. RESULTS: The authors included 231 patients undergoing 331 en bloc resections (female, 46%; mean age, 52 years). Nerve transection was documented in 87 resections (26%). There were 81 symptomatic neuromas (25%) meeting criteria of Tinel sign or pain on examination and neuropathy in the distribution of suspected nerve injury. Factors associated with symptomatic neuroma formation included age 18 to 39 [adjusted OR (aOR), 3.6; 95% CI, 1.5 to 8.4; P < 0.01] and 40 to 64 (aOR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.1 to 4.6; P = 0.04), multiple resections (aOR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.7 to 5.9; P < 0.001), preoperative neuromodulator requirement (aOR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.2 to 6.0; P = 0.01), and resection of fascia or muscle (aOR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3 to 1.0; P = 0.045). CONCLUSION: The authors' results highlight the importance of adequate preoperative optimization of pain control and intraoperative prophylaxis for neuroma prevention following en bloc resection of tumors, particularly for younger patients with a recurrent tumor burden. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.

The use of weakly supervised machine learning for necrosis assessment in patients with osteosarcoma: A pilot study.

Percent necrosis (PN) following chemotherapy is a prognostic factor for survival in osteosarcoma. Pathologists estimate PN by calculating tumor viability over an average of whole-slide images (WSIs). This non-standardized, labor-intensive process requires specialized training and has high interobserver variability. Therefore, we aimed to develop a machine-learning model capable of calculating PN in osteosarcoma with similar accuracy to that of a musculoskeletal pathologist. In this proof-of-concept study, we retrospectively obtained six WSIs from two patients with conventional osteosarcomas. A weakly supervised learning model was trained by using coarse and incomplete annotations of viable tumor, necrotic tumor, and nontumor tissue in WSIs. Weakly supervised learning refers to processes capable of creating predictive models on the basis of partially and imprecisely annotated data. Once "trained," the model segmented areas of tissue and determined PN of the same six WSIs. To assess model fidelity, the pathologist also estimated PN of each WSI, and we compared the estimates using Pearson's correlation and mean absolute error (MAE). MAE was 15% over the six samples, and 6.4% when an outlier was removed, for which the model inaccurately labeled cartilaginous tissue. The model and pathologist estimates were strongly, positively correlated (r = 0.85). Thus, we created and trained a weakly supervised machine learning model to segment viable tumor, necrotic tumor, and nontumor and to calculate PN with accuracy similar to that of a musculoskeletal pathologist. We expect improvement can be achieved by annotating cartilaginous and other mesenchymal tissue for better representation of the histological heterogeneity in osteosarcoma.

Predicting Risk of 30-day Postoperative Morbidity Using the Pathologic Fracture Mortality Index.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of the Pathologic Fracture Mortality Index (PFMI) to predict the risk of 30-day morbidity after pathologic fracture fixation and compare its efficacy with those of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status, modified Charlson Comorbidity Index (mCCI), and modified frailty index (mFI-5). METHODS: Cohorts of 1,723 patients in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2005 to 2020 and 159 patients from a tertiary cancer referral center who underwent fixation for impending or completed pathologic fractures of long bones were retrospectively analyzed. National Surgical Quality Improvement Program morbidity variables were categorized into medical, surgical, utilization, and all-cause. PFMI, ASA, mCCI, and mFI-5 scores were calculated for each patient. Area under the curve (AUC) was used to compare efficacies. RESULTS: AUCs predicting all-cause morbidity were 0.62, 0.54, and 0.56 for the PFMI, ASA, and mFI-5, respectively. The PFMI outperformed the ASA and mFI-5 in predicting all-cause ( P < 0.01), medical ( P = 0.01), and utilization ( P < 0.01) morbidities. In the 2005 to 2012 subset, the PFMI outperformed the ASA, mFI-5, and mCCI in predicting all-cause ( P = 0.01), medical ( P = 0.03), and surgical ( P = 0.05) morbidities but performed similarly to utilization morbidity ( P = 0.19). In our institutional cohort, the AUC for the PFMI in morbidity stratification was 0.68. The PFMI was associated with all-cause (odds ratio [OR], 1.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12 to 1.51; P < 0.001), medical (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.40; P = 0.046), and utilization (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.52; P < 0.001) morbidities but not significantly associated with surgical morbidity (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.98 to 1.49; P = 0.08) in this cohort. DISCUSSION: The PFMI is an advancement in postoperative morbidity risk stratification of patients with pathologic fracture from metastatic disease. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

The efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants compared with low-molecular-weight heparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after surgical resection of primary lower extremity bone or soft-tissue sarcoma.

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) and wound complications is greater after sarcoma resection. We sought to identify differences in postoperative VTE and bleeding complications with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) following resection of lower extremity primary bone or soft tissue sarcoma. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 2083 patients from the PearlDiver database who underwent resection of primary bone or soft tissue sarcoma of the lower extremity from January 2010 to October 2021 and prescribed LMWH or DOAC within 90-days postoperatively. The primary outcomes were comparison of postoperative incidence and odds of deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), and bleeding complications within 90-days following resection. RESULTS: Patients prescribed DOACs had a greater odds of DVT (odds ratio [OR]: 1.60; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06-2.41; p = 0.024) and PE (OR: 3.38; 95% CI: 1.96-5.86; p < 0.001) within 90-days following resection of bone sarcoma when compared with the LMWH cohort. Patients undergoing resection of soft tissue sarcomas also had greater odds DVT (OR: 1.65; 95% CI: 1.09-2.49; p = 0.016) and PE (OR: 2.62; 95% CI: 1.52-4.54; p < 0.001) in the DOAC cohort. There was no difference in the odds of bleeding complications. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated an increased incidence and odds of VTE, but not bleeding complications, when using DOACs versus LMWH after primary bone or soft tissue sarcoma resection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Team Approach: Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma.

¼ Synovial sarcoma is a soft tissue sarcoma that most commonly presents in the extremity in a periarticular location.¼ As the history and physical examination of patients with synovial sarcoma can overlap considerably with those of patients with non-oncologic orthopedic conditions, it is important that orthopedic surgeons maintain a high level of suspicion when caring for patients with extremity masses.¼ Soft tissue sarcomas are best treated using a team approach. Early recognition and referral to a multidisciplinary sarcoma team are crucial to ensure the best clinical outcome for the patient.

Functional outcomes after open reconstruction or nonoperative management of 81 pathologic acetabular fractures from metastatic bone disease.

Background: Pathologic acetabular fracture secondary to skeletal metastasis may result in debilitating pain, inability to ambulate, and impaired quality of life, which may mark the first period of dependent care in cancer patients. Acetabular reconstruction may involve morbid procedures with increased complication rates. This study aimed to evaluate the evolution of pain, performance status, and ambulation following nonoperative management or open reconstruction of pathologic acetabular fractures. Methods: A retrospective cohort of 2630 adult patients with osseous metastatic disease treated at a high-volume cancer center between 2005 and 2021 was screened for pathologic fractures of the acetabulum. The study outcomes were pain, performance status, and the ability to ambulate. We identified 78 patients (median age, 60 years; 37 female patients [46%]) with 81 fractures. Of these, treatment consisted of open reconstruction (n = 34) or nonoperative management alone (n = 47). The mean follow-up in surviving patients was 3.4 years. Results: Open reconstruction was performed more frequently for displaced fractures (P < 0.01), Harrington class III or IV acetabula (P < 0.01), and patients with a performance status ≥3 at hospitalization (P = 0.00). Open reconstruction was associated with clinically meaningful improvements in pain (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 8.3; 95% CI, 1.4-50.6; P = 0.02) and performance status (aOR, 10.9; 95% CI, 1.7-71.0; P = 0.01) at discharge and a restoration of ambulation (aOR, 7.5; 95% CI, 1.9-29.8; P < 0.01) at final follow-up. Conclusions: In patients with pathologic acetabular fracture due to osseous metastatic disease, functional improvements in pain, performance status, and ambulation were observed following open acetabular reconstruction in carefully selected patients, with no impact on survival, while noninferior improvements were observed in patients receiving nonoperative management when considering their larger clinical context. Level of evidence: Level III, therapeutic study.

Recurrent chondromyxoid fibroma of the distal femur treated with percutaneous cryoablation.

Chondromyxoid fibroma is a rare, benign tumor of the bone with excellent prognosis but a high rate of recurrence. We report a patient presenting with pain and a history of chondromyxoid fibroma of the distal left femur previously treated with multiple prior curettage and bone graft procedures. Magnetic resonance imaging and histopathology indicated a recurrence of tumor. Due to the small size of the tumor recurrence and challenges associated with prior open surgery, the patient underwent cryoablation of the lesion with computed tomography guidance. Follow-up 18 months later indicated a resolution of pain and improvement on magnetic resonance imaging, and no concerns after 20 months. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of chondromyxoid fibroma treated with cryoablation. This case suggests cryoablation could be considered in the setting of recurrent chondromyxoid fibroma for local tumor control.

Metastatic sarcomatoid carcinoma to bone.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Distinguishing sarcomatoid carcinoma from primary sarcoma is clinically important. We sought to characterize metastatic sarcomatoid bone disease and its management. METHODS: We analyzed the characteristics of all cases of sarcomatoid carcinoma to bone at a single institution from 2001 to 2021, excluding patients with nonosseous metastases. Survival was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: We identified 15 cases of metastatic sarcomatoid carcinoma to bone. In seven cases the primary cancer was unknown at presentation. Renal cell carcinoma was suspected or confirmed in nine cases. Nine patients presented with pathologic fracture and two with concomitant visceral metastases. All patients underwent image-guided core needle or open biopsy. Ten required surgery for discrete osseous metastases; in four cases definitive surgery was delayed (median delay, 19 days) due to inability to rule out sarcoma with frozen section. No patients required reoperation or had construct failure. Thirteen died of disease; median survival was 17.5 months (interquartile range, 6.2-25.1). CONCLUSIONS: Metastatic sarcomatoid carcinoma is a clinically challenging entity. Multidisciplinary input and communication are key to identifying the primary carcinoma, locating osseous metastases, and defining an operative fixation that will survive the remainder of the patient's life.

Incidence of and Risk Factors for Thromboembolism After Endoprosthetic Reconstruction in Musculoskeletal Oncology Patients.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to assess the incidence of and risk factors for thromboembolic events-including assessment of the intraoperative use of tranexamic acid and postoperative use of chemical thromboprophylaxis-in patients undergoing operative treatment of primary bone or soft-tissue sarcoma or oligometastatic bone disease. METHODS: This study was performed as a secondary analysis of prospective data collected from the Prophylactic Antibiotic Regimens in Tumor Surgery (PARITY) randomized controlled trial, which included 604 patients ≥12 years old who underwent surgical resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction for either primary bone or soft-tissue sarcoma or oligometastatic disease of the femur or tibia. We determined the incidence of thromboembolic events in these patients and evaluated potential risk factors, including patient age, sex, antibiotic treatment group, type of tumor (i.e., primary bone or soft-tissue sarcoma or metastatic bone disease), intraoperative tranexamic acid, tourniquet use, operative time, pathologic characteristics (i.e., American Joint Committee on Cancer grade, vascular invasion, and percent necrosis), postoperative chemical thromboprophylaxis regimen, and surgical site infection. Continuous variables were assessed with use of the Student t test. Categorical variables were assessed with use of the Pearson chi-square test, except when the expected cell counts were <5, in which case the Fisher exact test was utilized. Significance was set at 0.05. RESULTS: Postoperative thromboembolic events occurred in 11 (1.8%) of 604 patients. Patients who experienced a thromboembolic event had a significantly higher mean (± standard deviation) age (59.6 ± 17.5 years) than those who did not experience a thromboembolic event (40.9 ± 21.8; p = 0.002). Patients randomized to the long-term antibiotic group had a significantly higher incidence of thromboembolic events (9 of 293; 3.1%) than those randomized to the short-term antibiotic group (2 of 311; 0.64%; p = 0.03). Neither intraoperative tranexamic acid nor postoperative chemical thromboprophylaxis were significantly associated with the occurrence of a thromboembolic event. CONCLUSIONS: Although relatively rare in the PARITY cohort, thromboembolic events were more likely to occur in older patients and those receiving long-term prophylactic antibiotics. Intraoperative tranexamic acid and postoperative chemical thromboprophylaxis were not associated with a greater incidence of thromboembolic events. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Does the Use of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy and Postoperative Drains Impact the Development of Surgical Site Infections?: A PARITY Trial Secondary Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSIs) represent a major complication following oncologic reconstructions. Our objectives were (1) to assess whether the use of postoperative drains and/or negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) were associated with SSIs following lower-extremity oncologic reconstruction and (2) to identify factors associated with the duration of postoperative drains and with the duration of NPWT. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of the Prophylactic Antibiotic Regimens in Tumor Surgery (PARITY) trial, a multi-institution randomized controlled trial of lower-extremity oncologic reconstructions. Data were recorded regarding the use of drains alone, NPWT alone, or both NPWT and drains, including the total duration of each postoperatively. We analyzed postoperative drain duration and associations with tourniquet use, intraoperative thromboprophylaxis or antifibrinolytic use, incision length, resection length, and total operative time, through use of a linear regression model. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the independent predictors of SSI. RESULTS: Overall, 604 patients were included and the incidence of SSI was 15.9%. Postoperative drains alone were used in 409 patients (67.7%), NPWT alone was used in 15 patients (2.5%), and both postoperative drains and NPWT were used in 68 patients (11.3%). The median (and interquartile range [IQR]) duration of drains and of NPWT was 3 days (IQR, 2 to 5 days) and 6 days (IQR, 4 to 8 days), respectively. The use of postoperative drains alone, NPWT alone, or both drains and NPWT was not associated with SSI (p = 0.14). Increased postoperative drain duration was associated with longer operative times and no intraoperative tourniquet use, as shown on linear regression analysis (p < 0.001 and p = 0.03, respectively). A postoperative drain duration of ≥14 days (hazard ratio [HR], 3.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3 to 9.6; p = 0.01) and an operative time of ≥8 hours (HR, 4.5; 95% CI, 1.7 to 11.9; p = 0.002) were independent predictors of SSI following lower-extremity oncologic reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: A postoperative drain duration of ≥14 days and an operative time of ≥8 hours were independent predictors of SSI following lower-extremity oncologic reconstruction. Neither the use of postoperative drains nor the use of NPWT was a predictor of SSI. Future research is required to delineate the association of the combined use of postoperative drains and NPWT with SSI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Complex/cryptic EWSR1::FLI1/ERG Gene Fusions and 1q Jumping Translocation in Pediatric Ewing Sarcomas.

Ewing sarcomas (ES) are rare small round cell sarcomas often affecting children and characterized by gene fusions involving one member of the FET family of genes (usually EWSR1) and a member of the ETS family of transcription factors (usually FLI1 or ERG). The detection of EWSR1 rearrangements has important diagnostic value. Here, we conducted a retrospective review of 218 consecutive pediatric ES at diagnosis and found eight patients having data from chromosome analysis, FISH/microarray, and gene-fusion assay. Three of these eight ES had novel complex/cryptic EWSR1 rearrangements/fusions by chromosome analysis. One case had a t(9;11;22)(q22;q24;q12) three-way translocation involving EWSR1::FLI1 fusion and 1q jumping translocation. Two cases had cryptic EWSR1 rearrangements/fusions, including one case with a cryptic t(4;11;22)(q35;q24;q12) three-way translocation involving EWSR1::FLI1 fusion, and the other had a cryptic EWSR1::ERG rearrangement/fusion on an abnormal chromosome 22. All patients in this study had various aneuploidies with a gain of chromosome 8 (75%), the most common, followed by a gain of chromosomes 20 (50%) and 4 (37.5%), respectively. Recognition of complex and/or cryptic EWSR1 gene rearrangements/fusions and other chromosome abnormalities (such as jumping translocation and aneuploidies) using a combination of various genetic methods is important for accurate diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment outcomes of pediatric ES.

CNTNAP4 signaling regulates osteosarcoma disease progression.

Improved treatment strategies for sarcoma rely on clarification of the molecular mediators of disease progression. Recently, we reported that the secreted glycoprotein NELL-1 modulates osteosarcoma (OS) disease progression in part via altering the sarcomatous extracellular matrix (ECM) and cell-ECM interactions. Of known NELL-1 interactor proteins, Contactin-associated protein-like 4 (Cntnap4) encodes a member of the neurexin superfamily of transmembrane molecules best known for its presynaptic functions in the central nervous system. Here, CRISPR/Cas9 gene deletion of CNTNAP4 reduced OS tumor growth, sarcoma-associated angiogenesis, and pulmonary metastases. CNTNAP4 knockout (KO) in OS tumor cells largely phenocopied the effects of NELL-1 KO, including reductions in sarcoma cell attachment, migration, and invasion. Further, CNTNAP4 KO cells were found to be unresponsive to the effects of NELL-1 treatment. Transcriptomic analysis combined with protein phospho-array demonstrated notable reductions in the MAPK/ERK signaling cascade with CNTNAP4 deletion, and the ERK1/2 agonist isoproterenol restored cell functions among CNTNAP4 KO tumor cells. Finally, human primary cells and tissues in combination with sequencing datasets confirmed the significance of CNTNAP4 signaling in human sarcomas. In summary, our findings demonstrate the biological importance of NELL-1/CNTNAP4 signaling axis in disease progression of human sarcomas and suggest that targeting the NELL-1/CNTNAP4 signaling pathway represents a strategy with potential therapeutic benefit in sarcoma patients.

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Extremity and Truncal Soft Tissue Sarcomas: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Regional lymph node metastasis (RLNM) occurs infrequently in patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS), although certain STS subtypes have a higher propensity for RLNM. The identification of RLNM has significant implications for staging and prognosis; however, the precise impact of node-positive disease on patient survival remains a topic of controversy. Although the benefits of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) are well documented in patients with melanoma and breast cancer, whether this procedure offers a benefit in STS is controversial. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed and articles reviewed to determine if SLNB in patients with extremity/truncal STS impacts disease-free or overall survival. RESULTS: Six studies were included. Rates of sentinel lymph node positivity were heterogeneous (range 4.3-50%). The impact of SLNB on patient outcomes remains unclear. The overall quality of available evidence was low, as assessed by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system. CONCLUSIONS: The literature addressing the impact of nodal basin evaluation on the staging and management of patients with extremity/truncal STS is confounded by heterogeneous patient cohorts and clinical practices. Multicenter prospective studies are warranted to determine the true incidence of RLNM and whether SLNB could benefit patients with clinically occult RLNM at diagnosis.

Conventional Chondrosarcoma with Clear Cell Features in the Rib: Report of Two Cases and Review of the Literature.

A subset of clear cell chondrosarcomas may contain focal areas of low-grade conventional chondrosarcoma; however, it is rare to find foci resembling clear cell chondrosarcoma admixed with areas otherwise typical conventional chondrosarcoma. We report two patients with conventional chondrosarcoma with clear cell features occurring in the rib, one in the setting of multiple hereditary exostoses (MHE) and the other without MHE. Both patients were found to have a destructive rib mass with a soft tissue component and underwent en bloc resection. Histologic examination revealed predominantly grade 2 conventional chondrosarcomas; however, multiple foci containing large cells with pale eosinophilic to clear cytoplasm, distinct cell borders, centrally located nuclei, and conspicuous nucleoli, resembling clear cell chondrosarcoma were identified throughout the specimen. The significance of clear cell features in an otherwise typical conventional chondrosarcoma, to our knowledge, is unknown and deserves recognition. Finally, these tumors highlight the need for careful histologic examination and proper classification as unexpected findings may impact management.

Surgical management of extremity rhabdomyosarcoma: A consensus opinion from the Children's Oncology Group, the European Pediatric Soft-Tissue Sarcoma Study Group, and the Cooperative Weichteilsarkom Studiengruppe.

The treatment of extremity rhabdomyosarcoma remains a challenge due to several adverse prognostic factors frequently associated with this tumor site. The International Soft-Tissue Sarcoma Database Consortium (INSTRuCT) is a collaboration of the Children's Oncology Group Soft-Tissue Sarcoma Committee, the European Pediatric Soft-Tissue Sarcoma Study Group, and the Cooperative Weichteilsarkom Studiengruppe. The INSTRuCT surgical committee developed an internationally applicable consensus opinion document for the surgical treatment of extremity rhabdomyosarcoma. This document addresses surgical management, including biopsy, nodal staging, timing of therapy, resection and reexcision, reconstruction, and surgical approach at relapse.

Complete tumor necrosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy defines good responders in patients with Ewing sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Survival in patients who have Ewing sarcoma is correlated with postchemotherapy response (tumor necrosis). This treatment response has been categorized as the response rate, similar to what has been used in osteosarcoma. There is controversy regarding whether this is appropriate or whether it should be a dichotomy of complete versus incomplete response, given how important a complete response is for in overall survival of patients with Ewing sarcoma. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact that the amount of chemotherapy-induced necrosis has on (1) overall survival, (2) local recurrence-free survival, (3) metastasis-free survival, and (4) event-free survival in patients with Ewing sarcoma. METHODS: In total, 427 patients who had Ewing sarcoma or tumors in the Ewing sarcoma family and received treatment with preoperative chemotherapy and surgery at 10 international institutions were included. Multivariate Cox proportional-hazards analyses were used to assess the associations between tumor necrosis and all four outcomes while controlling for clinical factors identified in bivariate analysis, including age, tumor volume, location, surgical margins, metastatic disease at presentation, and preoperative radiotherapy. RESULTS: Patients who had a complete (100%) tumor response to chemotherapy had increased overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.26; 95% CI, 0.14-0.48; p < .01), recurrence-free survival (HR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.20-0.82; p = .01), metastasis-free survival (HR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.15-0.46; p ≤ .01), and event-free survival (HR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.16-0.41; p ≤ .01) compared with patients who had a partial (0%-99%) response. CONCLUSIONS: Complete tumor necrosis should be the index parameter to grade response to treatment as satisfactory in patients with Ewing sarcoma. Any viable tumor in these patients after neoadjuvant treatment should be of oncologic concern. These findings can affect the design of new clinical trials and the risk-stratified application of conventional or novel treatments.

What Proportion of Patients With Musculoskeletal Tumors Demonstrate Thromboelastographic Markers of Hypercoagulability? A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Thromboelastography (TEG) is a point-of-care venipuncture test that measures the elasticity and strength of a clot formed from a patient's blood, providing a more comprehensive analysis of a patient's coagulation status than conventional measures of coagulation. TEG includes four primary markers: R-time, which measures the time to clot initiation and is a proxy for platelet function; K-value, which measures the time for said clot to reach an amplitude of 20 mm and is a proxy for fibrin cross-linking; maximum amplitude (MA), which measures the clot's maximum amplitude and is a proxy for platelet aggregation; and LY30, which measures the percentage of clot lysis 30 minutes after reaching the MA and is a proxy for fibrinolysis. Analysis of TEG-derived coagulation profiles may help surgeons identify patient-related and disease-related factors associated with hypercoagulability. TEG-derived coagulation profiles of patients with musculoskeletal oncology conditions have yet to be characterized. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What TEG coagulation profile markers are most frequently aberrant in patients with musculoskeletal oncology conditions presenting for surgery? (2) Among patients with musculoskeletal oncology conditions presenting for surgery, what factors are more common in those with TEG-defined hypercoagulability? (3) Do patients with musculoskeletal oncology conditions with preoperative TEG-defined hypercoagulability have a higher postoperative incidence of clinically symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) than those with a normal TEG profile? METHODS: In this retrospective, pilot study, we analyzed preoperatively drawn TEG assays on 52 patients with either primary bone sarcoma, soft tissue sarcoma, or metastatic disease to bone who were scheduled to undergo either tumor resection or nail stabilization. Between January 2020 and December 2021, our orthopaedic oncology service treated 410 patients in total. Of these, 13% (53 of 410 patients) had preoperatively drawn TEG assays. TEG assays were collected preincision as part of a division initiative to integrate the assay into a clinical care protocol for patients with primary bone or soft tissue sarcoma or metastatic disease to bone. Unfortunately, failures to adequately communicate this to our anesthesia colleagues on a consistent basis resulted in a low overall rate of assay draws from eligible patients. One patient on therapeutic anticoagulation preoperatively for the treatment of active VTE was excluded, leaving 52 patients eligible for analysis. We did not exclude patients taking prophylactic antiplatelet therapy preoperatively. All patients were followed for a minimum of 6 weeks postoperatively. We analyzed factors (age, sex, tumor location, presence of metastases, and soft tissue versus bony disease) in reference to hypercoagulability, defined as a TEG result indicating supranormal clot formation (for example, reduced R-time, reduced K-value, or increased MA). Patients with clinical concern for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (typically painful swelling of the affected extremity) or pulmonary embolism (typically by dyspnea, tachycardia, and/or chest pain) underwent duplex ultrasonography or chest CT angiography, respectively, to confirm the diagnosis. Categorical variables were analyzed via a Pearson chi-square test and continuous variables were analyzed via t-test, with significance defined at α = 0.05. RESULTS: Overall, 60% (31 of 52) of patients had an abnormal preoperative TEG result. All abnormal TEG assay results demonstrated markers of hypercoagulability. The most frequent aberration was a reduced K-value (40% [21 of 52] of patients), followed by reduced R-time (35% [18 of 52] of patients) and increased MA (17% [9 of 52] of patients). The mean ± SD TEG markers were R-time: 4.3 ± 1.0, K-value: 1.2 ± 0.4, MA: 66.9 ± 7.7, and LY30: 1.0 ± 1.2. There was no association between hypercoagulability and tumor location or metastatic stage. The mean age of patients with TEG-defined hypercoagulability was higher than those with a normal TEG profile (44 ± 23 years versus 59 ± 17 years, mean difference 15 [95% confidence interval (CI) 4 to 26]; p = 0.01). In addition, female patients were more likely than male patients to demonstrate TEG-defined hypercoagulability (75% [18 of 24] of female patients versus 46% [13 of 28] of male patients, OR 3.5 [95% CI 1 to 11]; p = 0.04) as were those with soft tissue disease (as opposed to bony) (77% [20 of 26] of patients with soft tissue versus 42% [11 of 26] of patients with bony disease, OR 4.6 [95% CI 1 to 15]; p = 0.01). Postoperatively, symptomatic DVT developed in 10% (5 of 52; four proximal DVTs, one distal DVT) of patients, and no patients developed symptomatic pulmonary embolism. Patients with preoperative TEG-defined hypercoagulability were more likely to be diagnosed with symptomatic postoperative DVT than patients with normal TEG profiles (16% [5 of 31] of patients with TEG-defined hypercoagulability versus 0% [0 of 21] of patients with normal TEG profiles; p = 0.05). No patients with normal preoperative TEG profiles had clinically symptomatic VTE. CONCLUSION: Patients with musculoskeletal tumors are at high risk of hypercoagulability as determined by TEG. Patients who were older, female, and had soft tissue disease (as opposed to bony) were more likely to demonstrate TEG-defined hypercoagulability in our cohort. The postoperative VTE incidence was higher among patients with preoperative TEG-defined hypercoagulability. The findings in this pilot study warrant further investigation, perhaps through multicenter collaboration that can provide a sufficient cohort to power a robust, multivariable analysis, better characterizing patient and disease risk factors for hypercoagulability. Patients with TEG-defined hypercoagulability may warrant a higher index of suspicion for VTE and careful thought regarding their chemoprophylaxis regimen. Future work may also evaluate the effectiveness of TEG-guided chemoprophylaxis, as results of the assay may inform selection of antiplatelet versus anticoagulant agent. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.